Lithium & Critical Minerals

Lithium & Critical Minerals: Revolutionizing Extraction Economics

From 18-month solar evaporation timelines to 3-month production with breakthrough membrane concentration technology

Key Benefits

Timeline: 3–6 months vs 18–24 months solar evaporation

Footprint: 80–90 percent smaller than evaporation ponds

Water Recovery: 70–80 percent vs 5–20 percent traditional

Concentration: 20g/L+ reduces downstream costs

The Lithium Extraction Bottleneck

Current Industry Problems

Solar Evaporation Limitations

Timeline: 18–24 months from brine to lithium concentrate
Water Loss: 80–95 percent of original brine volume lost to atmosphere
Weather Dependency: Production affected by rainfall and humidity
Land Requirements: Massive evaporation pond footprints
Environmental Impact: Significant water consumption in arid regions

Challenge	Traditional Approach	Our Solution
Implementation Time	6–12 months	2–4 weeks
Integration Issues	Frequent, complex	Seamless, out-of-the-box
Cost	High upfront	Subscription-based
User Experience	Outdated interfaces	Modern, intuitive UI
Support	Limited, slow	24/7 dedicated support

Challenge	Traditional Approach	Our Solution
Implementation Time	6–12 months	2–4 weeks
Integration Issues	Frequent, complex	Seamless, out-of-the-box
Cost	High upfront	Subscription-based
User Experience	Outdated interfaces	Modern, intuitive UI
Support	Limited, slow	24/7 dedicated support

DLE Technology Gaps

Effectiveness Dependency: DLE effectiveness is highly dependent on downstream concentration technologies
Dilute Streams: Selective extraction of lithium produces very dilute streams requiring extensive downstream processing
Fresh Water Requirements: Large fresh water inputs for processing and regeneration
Crystallizer Size: Large, expensive crystallization systems needed for dilute feeds
Economic Challenge: High downstream processing costs limit project economics

The Missing Link

Current DLE technologies can selectively extract lithium, but the resulting streams are too dilute for economical downstream processing. The industry needs breakthrough concentration technology to make DLE economically viable.

Challenge	Traditional Approach	Our Solution
Implementation Time	6–12 months	2–4 weeks
Integration Issues	Frequent, complex	Seamless, out-of-the-box
Cost	High upfront	Subscription-based
User Experience	Outdated interfaces	Modern, intuitive UI
Support	Limited, slow	24/7 dedicated support

Revolutionary Membrane Solutions for Lithium Processing

Enhanced Solar Evaporation Process

1. Brine Extraction (0.1–0.2 percent Li from salt lakes/underground)

2. OSMOSYS Pre-Concentration using MBC™ technology

3. Water Recovery (70–80 percent of original volume recovered as pure water)

4. Concentrated Brine (about 6 percent Li to final evaporation pond)

5. Accelerated Chemical Processing (crystallization-ready concentration)

Revolutionary Results

Timeline: 3–6 months vs 18–24 months solar evaporation

Water Loss: 20–30 percent vs 80–95 percent traditional evaporation

Footprint: 80–90 percent smaller than conventional evaporation ponds

Pure Water Recovery: Recovered water can be reused or returned to environment

Enhanced DLE Integration

Brine Extraction & Pretreatment

Li-Max™ Selective Extraction (removes lithium from brine matrix)

MBC™ Concentration (concentrates dilute DLE streams to 20g/L+ Li+)

Clean Water Reuse/Discharge (recovered water for operations)

Reduced Crystallization (smaller, more economical crystallizers)

Game-Changing Advantages

20g/L+ Concentration: Dramatically reduces downstream crystallization costs

Eliminated Fresh Water: No large fresh water requirements for processing

Integrated Approach: Li-Max™ and MBC™ technologies work together seamlessly

Economic Viability: Makes marginal lithium resources profitable

Reduced Infrastructure: Smaller crystallizers and processing equipment

Key Performance Metrics

Timeline Transformation

Traditional Solar Evaporation: 18–24 months brine-to-product

OSMOSYS Enhanced Process: 3–6 months brine-to-product

Improvement: 75–85 percent timeline reduction

Metric	Before	After
Onboarding Time	30 days	5 days
Customer Satisfaction Rate	68%	92%
Support Ticket Resolution	48 hours	4 hours
Annual Cost	$50,000	$18,000

Metric	Before	After
Onboarding Time	30 days	5 days
Customer Satisfaction Rate	68%	92%
Support Ticket Resolution	48 hours	4 hours
Annual Cost	$50,000	$18,000

Water Efficiency

Traditional Process: 80–95 percent water loss through evaporation

OSMOSYS Process: 20–30 percent water loss, 70–80 percent recovery

Footprint Reduction

Evaporation Ponds: Require square kilometers of land

OSMOSYS Systems: 80–90 percent smaller footprint

Metric	Before	After
Onboarding Time	30 days	5 days
Customer Satisfaction Rate	68%	92%
Support Ticket Resolution	48 hours	4 hours
Annual Cost	$50,000	$18,000

Beyond Lithium: Complete Critical Mineral Recovery

Lithium Applications

Battery-Grade Lithium Carbonate: EV and energy storage applications

Lithium Hydroxide: Advanced battery chemistries

Industrial Lithium: Ceramics, glass, and pharmaceutical applications

Other Critical Minerals

Barium: High-purity barium recovery from industrial brines for drilling fluids and chemicals
Rare Earth Elements: Selective extraction and concentration of REE from mining operations
Magnesium: Industrial-grade magnesium recovery for metal production
Potash: Enhanced potash production from brines for fertilizer applications
Cesium: High-value cesium recovery from specialized brines

Market Applications

EV Industry: Battery-grade lithium for electric vehicle production
Energy Storage: Grid-scale battery systems and residential storage
Industrial Chemicals: High-purity minerals for specialized applications
Agriculture: Potash and other minerals for fertilizer production
Technology Sector: Critical minerals for electronics and advanced materials

Where Our Technology Creates Value

Salt Lake Brines

Oilfield Brines

Geothermal Brines

Mining Operations

Ready to Revolutionize Your Lithium Extraction Economics?

Schedule Technical Consultation